Gestational age categories

OR (95% CI)

P value

 

 

Premature n/N(%) n=365

Term n’/N (%) n=365

 

 

Maternal age

 

 

 

 

<20

9/12 (19.1)

3/12 (4.8)

5.05 (1.277 – 20.0)

0.021

20 – 34

32/86(68.1)

54/86(86)

0.592 (0.206 – 18.6)

0.026

≥35

6/12 (12.8)

6/12 (9,5)

1.000 (0.501 –5.681)

0.392

Marital status

Single

6/19 (15.4)

13/19 (25.5)

0.53 (0.18- 1.56)

0.303

Married

33/71 (84.6)

38/71(74.5)

 

 

Occupation

Civil servant

4/15 (10.3)

11/15(21.6)

0.357(0.112 – 1.130)

0.08

Private sector

3/5 (7.7)

2/5 (3.9)

0.242 (0.029 – 2.027)

0.191

Informal sector

24/45 (61.5)

21/45(41.2)

0.318 (0.088 – 1.151)

0.081

Student

8/25 (20.5)

17/25(33.3)

0.773 (0.187 – 3.196)

0.722

Level of education

Primary & Secondary

14/23(51.9)

9/23 (23.1)

4.090 (1.243 - 10.67)

0.018

Superior level

13/43 (48.1)

30/43 (76.9)

0.279(0.096 – 0.805)

0.018

Residence

Urban area

237/514 (64.9)

277/514 (75.9)

0.588 (0.426 – 0.812)

0.001

Rural area

128/216 (35.1)

88/216 (24.1)

 

 

Table 1:Maternal sociodemographic characteristics

 

Gestational age categories

OR (95% CI)

P value

Premature n/N(%)
n=365

Term n’/N (%)
n=365

 

 

Parity

Primipara

54/114(34.6)

60/114(37.3)

0.891(0.096 – 0.563)

0.623

Multipara

79/167(50.6)

88/167(54.7)

0.992 (0.712 – 1.421)

0.992

Grand multipara

23/36(14.7)

13/36(8.1)

1.923(0.899 - 4.892)

0.087

Pregnancy followed Up

Yes

192/315(97.5)

123/315(97.6)

0.937 (0.220 -3.989)

0.929

No

5/8 (2.5)

3/8 (2.4)

 

 

Number of ANC*

0

5/8 (3.3)

3/8 (2.7)

1.216(0.285 – 5.199)

0.792

1 – 3

81/111(52.9)

30/111(27.0)

3.144(1.871 – 5.234)

0.000

≥4

67/145(43.8)

78/145(70.3)

0.330(0.196 – 0.553)

0.000

Place of follow up

BRH

13/20(20.0)

7/20(14.0)

1.536(0.563 – 4.190)

0.401

Other hospital

33/63(50.8)

30/63(60.0)

0.592 (0.1876 – 5.32)

0.325

Health center

19/32(29.2)

13/32(26.0)

0.786(0.119 – 3.254)

0.685

HIV Status

Positive

7/10(1.9)

3/10(0.8)

2.373(0.609 – 9.243)

0.213

Negative

356/718(98.1)

362/718(99.2)

 

 

ANC*Antenatal care BRH† Bamenda Regional Hospital

 

PATHOLOGIES

 

Gestational age categories

 

Total

 

OR (95% CI)

 

P value

PRETERM
n/N(%)

TERM
N’ /N(%)

Diabetes

YES

2/2(0.5)

0/2(0.0)

2(0.3)

--

--

NO

363/728(99.5)

365/728(100.0)

728(99.7)

 

 

Respiratory disease

YES

½(0.3)

½(0.3)

2(0.3)

1.000

1.000

NO

364/728(99.7)

364/728(99.7)

728(99.7)

 

 

Chronic high blood
pressure

YES

3/3(0.8)

0/3(0.0)

3(0.4)

--

--

NO

362/728(99.2)

365/727(100.0)

727(99.6)

 

 

Heart disease

NO

365(100.0)

365(100.0)

730(100.0)

--

--

Eclampsia

YES

1/3(0.3)

2/3(0.5)

3(0.4)

0.499 (0.043 – 5.266)

0.563

NO

364/723(99.7)

363(99.5)

727(99.6)

 

 

Pregnancy induced HTN (Pre-eclampsia)

YES

24/28(6.6)

4/24(1.1)

28(3.8)

6.234 (2.132 – 18.251)

0.000

NO

341/702(93.4)

361/702(98.9)

702(96.2)

 

 

Prolonged rupture of
membranes

YES

48/56(13.2)

8/56(2.2)

56(7.7)

6.321 (3.211 – 14.251)

0.000

NO

317/674(86.8)

357/674(97.8)

674(92.3)

 

 

Placenta previa

YES

17/18(4.7)

1/18(0.3)

18(2.5)

17.23 (2.315 – 133.62)

0.000

NO

348/711(95.3)

363/711(99.7)

711(97.5)

 

 

 

Placenta abruption

YES

9/9(2.5)

0/9(0.0)

9(1.2)

--

0.004

NO

356/721(97.5)

365/721(100.0)

721(98.8)

 

 

Malaria

YES

52/65(14.2)

13/65(3.6)

65(8.9)

4.213 (2.321 – 8.255)

0.000

NO

313/665(85.8)

352/665(96.4)

665(91.1)

 

 

Toxoplasmosis

YES

6/6(1.6)

0/6(0.0)

6(0.8)

--

0.031

NO

359/724(98.4)

365/724(100.0)

724(99.2)

 

 

Syphilis

YES

3/3(0.8)

0/3(0.0)

3(0.4)

--

0.249

NO

362/727(99.2)

365/727(100)

727(99.6)

 

 

Urogenital infection

YES

12/15(3.3)

3/15(0.8)

15(2.1)

4.123 (1.233 – 14.23)

0.033

NO

353/715(96.7)

362/715(99.2)

715(97.9)

 

 

Table 3: Maternal pathologies associated with prematurity

Preterm birth is a major clinical problem associated with significant mortality and morbidity [1-3]. An estimated 15 million babies are born too early every year and this rate is increasing in almost all countries [2,4-6].. It is the leading cause of death in children under the age of 5years [1,3,7] . Globally, it is estimated that 1.1 million neonatal deaths occur annually due to preterm birth complications with 80% of these occurring in Asia and sub-Saharan Africa [1,6].This study had as aim to determine the incidence, identify the risk factors, and the outcome of preterm babies in the Bamenda Regional Hospital (BRH), in the North West Region of Cameroon.

Study design and period

We conducted a four-year retrospective case – control study over a period of three months from March 1st to May 31th, 2020. Our study involved all neonates hospitalized at the Neonatology Unit of the Bamenda Regional Hospital, from January 1st, 2016 to December 31th, 2019.

Study setting

This study was conducted at the Neonatology Unit of the BRH. The BRH is situated in the Bamenda II Subdivision in Mezam Division in the Northwest Region of Cameroon. The Neonatology Unit is made up of outpatient consultation and the neonatal ward. The unit also has a kangaroo ward where preterm children are followed up and monitored by doctors for proper growth. The unit has three medical doctors (1 Paediatrician and 2 General Practitioners) and 11 nurses. The Neonatal ward has 14 functional incubators, 30 cots and 16 beds.

Patient selection

The files of all neonates hospitalized at the BRH during the study period were identified from the admission registers. Information from each neonate’s file, were extracted onto a pre-tested questionnaire designed for this purpose. Each file of a preterm neonate examined was followed by a corresponding term neonate’s file. The files of the preterm neonates (every life newborn born at less than 37 gestational weeks) constituted the case group while term neonates (every life new-born born at greater than or equal to 37 gestational weeks) constituted the control group. The case/control ratio was 1:1. Information on maternal sociodemographic characteristics, obstetrical history, prenatal, perinatal, and postnatal data and admission in the Neonatology Unit were collected from the files. Every nonviable new-born and those with incomplete files were not retained for this study.

Data management and statistical analysis

Data was entered and analysed using SPSS for windows version 26.0. Qualitative variables were reported as counts and proportions while quantitative variables were summarized as means and medians with their corresponding standard deviations (SD) and interquartile ranges (IQR) respectively. The Fisher’s exact test or Chi-squared test were used to compare categorical variables. After bivariate logistic regression analysis, all variables with a p-value less than 0.05 underwent multivariate analysis with logistic regression, to identify independent risk factors of preterm birth.

Ethics

Ethical clearance was obtained from the ethical committee of the Faculty of Health Sciences, of the University of Bamenda, and administrative authorization from the Regional Delegate of Public Health for the North West Region, Bamenda, and the Director of the Bamenda Regional Hospital. The Institutional Review Board of the University of Bamenda approved this study (No. 2020/0026H/UBa/IRB).

Four thousand one hundred and seventeen neonates were hospitalized at the Neonatology Unit of the BRH during the study period among which 762 were preterm neonates giving a proportion of 18.5%. The prevalence of preterm birth dropped from 17.7% in 2016 to 16.51% in 2017 and rose again to 24.04% in 2018, and finally dropped to 15.81% in 2019.

Of the 762 preterm neonates, we found 568 files, excluded 203 files, which were incomplete, and retained 365 files, that met our inclusion criteria. We matched these files with files of 365 term neonates giving a case to control ratio of 1:1.

Characteristics of the preterm neonates

Most of the preterm neonates, 198 (53.4%), were males. The majority of preterm neonates, 269(73.7%), had a birth weight between 1500 to 2499g, while 14 (3.9%) had birth weights greater than or equals to 2500g, and finally 82 (22.4%) had birth weights less than 1500g. Most of the preterm neonates, 236 (64.6%), were born between 33 – 36 weeks gestational age, 124 (34.2%) were born between 28 – 32 weeks, while 5 (1.37%) were born at less than 28 weeks of gestation.

Maternal sociodemographic characteristics

The majority of the preterm neonates, 32(68.1%), were from mothers in the age group 20 – 34 years, 33 (84.6%) were from married mothers, 24 (61.5%) were from mothers working in the informal sector, 14(51.9%) of the mothers had attended at least up to secondary school, and 237(64.9%) of the mothers lived in urban areas.

Maternal age less than 20years [OR=5.05; CI 95 (1.277 – 20.0); P=0.021] and having a level of education less than secondary school [OR=4.090; C.I.95 (1.243 - 10.67); P=0.018] were risk factors of preterm birth. The protective factors were a maternal age group of 20 – 34 years [OR=0.592; CI 95 (0.206 – 18.6); P=0.026] and living in an urban area [OR=0.588; C.I.95 (0.426 – 0.812); P=0.001] (Table 1).

Table 1

Maternal obstetrics characteristics

Most of the mothers of the preterm neonates, 79 (50.6%), were multiparous, 193 (97.5%) had been followed up for their pregnancies; 33(50.8%) were followed up at the Bamenda Regional Hospital, and 356 (98.1%) of the mothers had a negative HIV serology. Attending less than four antenatal consultations (ANC) was a risk factor for preterm birth [OR=3.144; CI 95 (1.871 – 5.234); P=0.000] (Table 2).

Maternal pathologies associated with preterm birth

Among the maternal pathologies studied: preeclampsia [OR=6.234; C.I.95 (2.132 – 18.251), P=0.000], placenta previa [OR=6.321; C.I.95(3.211–14.251); P=0.000], premature/prolonged rupture of membranes[OR=17.23;C.I.95(2.315–133.62); P=0.000], malaria in pregnancy [OR=4.213; C.I.95(2.321–8.255); P=0.000], and urogenital infections [OR=4.123 ;CI 95 (1.233– 14.23); P=0.033] were all risk factors associated with preterm delivery (Table 3).

Table 2

Table 3

Foetal risk factors of preterm birth

The majority of preterm births, 192(52.6%), were from singleton gestation, while 5(1.4%) had congenital malformations. Multiple pregnancy was a risk factor for prematurity [OR=9.708; CI 95 (6.341 – 14.724); P=0.0001] (Table 4).

Multivariate analysis of the factors statistically significant on bivariate analysis showed that a level of education less than the secondary level [AOR=2.857; CI 95 (1.120-7.487); P=0.034], prolonged rupture of membranes [AOR=2.737; CI 95(1.133- 6,611); P=0.025], and multiple pregnancies [AOR=4.772; CI 95 (2.415-9,428); P=0.000] were independent risk factors for preterm birth./p>

Hospital outcome

The majority of preterm neonates, 326(89.3%), had a favourable evolution in the hospital. We noted that, 314(86.0%) preterm babies were discharged alive from the hospital, while 39(10.7%) died during hospitalization, 9 (2.5%) were discharged against medical advice and 3 (0.8%) were referred to other hospitals. Most preterm neonates, 28 (71.8%) died during the early neonatal period (0 – 7 days). Most preterm neonatal deaths, 26(65%), were due to apnoea of prematurity, while 5(12.5%) were due to neonatal infection, 5(12.5%) were due to respiratory distress, 2(5%) were due to anaemia, and 2(5%) were due to necrotizing enterocolitis. Most of the preterm neonates, 142 (38.9%), stayed in the hospital for a duration of 0 – 10 days, while 121(33.2%) were hospitalized for a period of 11 – 20 days and 102 (27.9%) were in the hospital for more than 20 days.

Discussion

The prevalence of prematurity in this study was 18.5%. This is similar to the prevalence of 18.3% obtained in Kenya in 2018 [8], 16.9% and 16.8% obtained in Nigeria in 2014 [3] and 2016 [9] respectively. Similar study designs, study settings and study subjects can explain the reason of these similarities.

This prevalence was higher than the 12% and 9% reported in 2017 for both low- and high-income countries respectively [10]. It was also higher than the findings of other studies carried out in Africa: 12% in Senegal in 2005 [11], 9.3% in Ghana in 2006 [12], 11.8% in Nigeria in 2010 [13], 13.3% in Ethiopia in 2019 [14], and 13.8% in South Africa in 2019 [15]. Our prevalence was higher than the prevalence found in other parts of the world;12% and 11.1% for both black and white women respectively in USA in 2004 [16], 2.4% and 5.1% in Iran in 2012 [17] and 2014 [18] respectively, 13.1% and 11.5% in Brazil in 2004 [19] and 2016 [20], respectively. These differences could be due to different study designs, settings, as well as inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the quality of healthcare provided.

This prevalence was lower than that reported in the Yaounde Gyneco – Obstetrics and Pediatrics Hospital (YGOPH) in 2013 of 26.6% [21].This difference, despite the fact that both studies have the same study design and study setting, could be because the YGOPH is one of the main mother and child referral centres in Cameroon. Moreover, the authors did a nine years retrospective case – control study while we did a four years retrospective case – control study. Our prevalence was also lower than 28.1% reported in 2018 in Senegal [22]. The difference here may be because both studies have different study designs, and the study in Senegal was conducted in a tertiary referral centre that received cases from other hospitals around the country

Mothers who were still attending primary and secondary school were almost three times more likely to give birth to preterm babies than those of higher level of education. Our findings are similar to those of studies done in 2017 in Italy [23], in the United Kingdom in 2015 [24] and Balochistan in 2017 [10]. The possible explanation is that most secondary school girls are often psychologically stressed up during pregnancy and lack the care needed during pregnancy and this can lead to preterm delivery. Moreover, the lack of knowledge and experience on pregnancy can contribute to preterm birth. However, a study conducted in the USA in 2012 reported that secondary education is a protective factor of preterm birth while tertiary education is a risk factor [25]. Other authors did not have a statistical significant association between preterm birth and maternal education [8, 20, 21].

In this study, preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) was an independent predictor of preterm birth. Other authors reported similar findings but to different extends [8,11,18,20]. PPROM causes the release of inflammatory cytokines like prostaglandins, interleukins 6 and tumour necrosis factor (TNF) that stimulate and initiate contractions of the uterine smooth muscles hence leading to preterm birth [8,9,11,26].The study in the YGOPH found no statistical significant association between PPROM and preterm birth [21].

In this study, mothers who had multiple gestations were about five times more likely to deliver preterm babies than those that had singleton pregnancies. This is consistent with studies done in Yaounde, Cameroon in 2013 [21], Kenya in 2018 [8], Nigeria in 2010 [13], Ethiopia in 2018 [14], Senegal in 2004 [11], Iran in 2014 [18] and Brazil in 2016 [20]. Multiple gestation leads to over-distension of the uterus and up-regulation of oxytocin receptors and initiation of contractions leading to preterm labour and premature delivery [18,26,27]. Moreover, over-distension of the uterus leads to stretch of membranes that result in the release of prostaglandins that initiate preterm labour that can lead to preterm delivery [14].

The neonatal mortality rate of 10.7% in this study was lower than that reported by other authors: 35.3% in Ghana [12] and 21.6% in Bhutan in 2019 [28]. This was however higher than 8.6% reported in Nigeria [29]. This disparity could be due to different study designs, study periods, inclusion and exclusion criteria and care provided. Most of the preterm neonates (71.8%) died during the early neonatal period, which is similar to what was observed in the YGOPH of 69% [21] and in the Yaounde Central Hospital (YCH) of 62.5% [30]. However, in Ghana in 2006 a study found that more preterm neonates (75.7%) died during late neonatal period [12].

The most common causes of death of preterm babies were in descending order of occurrence apnoea, neonatal infection, respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), anaemia and necrotizing enterocolitis. Similar findings were reported at the YCH with neonatal infection, neonatal asphyxia, congenital malformations and RDS the most common causes of death [30], while at the YGOPH, neonatal infection, neonatal asphyxia and congenital malformation were the most common causes of death [21]. A study in 2019 in Ethiopia reported RDS, neonatal infection and neonatal asphyxia [31]. Another study in the USA in 2019 reported neonatal sepsis, preterm birth related complications, neonatal asphyxia and congenital malformations [32].Whereas, a study in 2009 found non-infectious respiratory distress, intracranial haemorrhages, and neonatal infection [33]. The differences could be due to different study designs, settings, inclusions and exclusion criteria.

The prevalence of preterm births remains high in this setting. Information, education and communication on the importance of adequate follow up during pregnancy and delivery should be reinforced. Prevention in risk groups and prevention of PPROM can go a long way to reduce this prevalence and associated morbidity.

Thanks to the nurses of the neonatology unit of the Regional Hospital Bamenda for helping retrieve files from the archives.

The authors report no conflict of interest

None


  1. World Health Organisation WHO (2018) Preterm birth internet, Geneva, Switzerland.
  2. Vogel JP, Chawanpaiboon S, Moller AB, Watananirun K, Bonet M, Lumbiganon P. (2018) The global epidemiology of preterm birth. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 52: 3–12.
  3. Iyoke CA, Lawani OL, Ezugwu EC, Ilechukwu G, Nkwo PO, Mba SG, et al. (2014). Prevalence and perinatal mortality associated with preterm births in a tertiary medical center in South East Nigeria. Int J Womens Health. 17; 2014:881—888.
  4. Muglia LJ, Katz M. (2010). The Enigma of Spontaneous Preterm Birth. N Engl J of Med. Feb 11;362(6):529–35.
  5. Beck S, Wojdyla D, Say L, Betran AP, Merialdi M, Requejo JH, et al. (2010). The worldwide incidence of preterm birth: a systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity. Bull World Health Organ. ; 88:31–8.
  6. Chawanpaiboon S, Vogel JP, Moller AB, Lumbiganon P, Petzold M, Hogan D, et al. (2019). Global, regional, and national estimates of levels of preterm birth in 2014: a systematic review and modelling analysis. Lancet Global Health. 1;7(1):e37–46.
  7. Institute of Medicine (US) Round table on Environmental Health Sciences Research and Medicine; Mattison DR, Wilson S, Coussens C, Gilbert D., editors. The Role of Environmental Hazards in Premature Birth: Workshop Summary. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2003. 1, Preterm Birth and Its Consequences.
  8. Wagura P, Wasunna A, Laving A, Wamalwa D, Ng’ang’a P. (2018). Prevalence and factors associated with preterm birth at kenyatta national hospital. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 19;18(1):107.
  9. Butali A, Ezeaka C, Ekhaguere O, Weathers N, Ladd J, Fajolu I, et al. (2016). Characteristics and risk factors of preterm births in a tertiary center in Lagos, Nigeria. Pan Afr Med J. 1;24:1.
  10. Murad M, Arbab M, Khan MB, Ali M, Tareen S, Khan MW. (2017) Study of factors affecting and causing preterm birth. J Entomol Zool Stud.; 5(2):6-9.
  11. Ndiaye O, Fall AL, Dramé A, Sylla A, Guèye M, Cissé CT, et al. (2006). Facteurs étiologiques de la prématurité au centre hospitalier régional de Ziguinchor (Sénégal): Bull Soc Pathol Exot;99(2):113-4.
  12. Nkyekyer K, Enweronu-Laryea C, Boafor T. (2006) Singleton Preterm Births in Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana - Origins and Outcomes. Ghana Med J.;40(3):93–8.
  13. Mokuolu OA, Suleiman B, Adesiyun O, Adeniyi A. (2010) Prevalence and determinants of pre-term deliveries in the University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Ilorin, Nigeria. Pediatr Rep. 18;2(1):e3.
  14. Aregawi G, Assefa N, Mesfin F, Tekulu F, Adhena T, Mulugeta M, et al. (2019) Preterm births and associated factors among mothers who gave birth in Axum and Adwa Town public hospitals, Northern Ethiopia, 2018. BMC Research Notes. 2;12(1):640.
  15. Brink LT, Gebhardt GS, Mason D, Groenewald CA, Odendaal HJ. (2019). The association between preterm labour, perinatal mortality and infant death (during the first year) in Bishop Lavis, Cape Town, South Africa. S Afr Med J. 31;109(2):102.
  16. Dole N, Savitz DA, Siega-Riz AM, Hertz-Picciotto I, McMahon MJ, Buekens P. (2004). Psychosocial Factors and Preterm Birth Among African American and White Women in Central North Carolina. Am J Public Health. 1;94(8):1358–65.
  17. Nabavizadeh SH, Malekzadeh M, Mousavizadeh A, Shirazi HR, Ghaffari P, Karshenas N, et al. (2012). Retrospective study of factors related to preterm labor in Yasuj, Iran. Int J Gen Med. 12;5:1013–7.
  18. Alijahan R, Hazrati S, Mirzarahimi M, Pourfarzi F, Ahmadi Hadi P. (2014). Prevalence and risk factors associated with preterm birth in Ardabil, Iran. Iran J Reprod Med.;12(1):47–56.
  19. Aragão VM, da Silva AA, de Aragão LF, Barbieri MA, Bettiol H, Coimbra LC, et al. (2004). Risk factors for preterm births in São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil. Cadernos de Saúde Pública.;20(1):57–63.
  20. Leal MD, Esteves-Pereira AP, Nakamura-Pereira M, Torres JA, Theme-Filha M, Domingues RM, et al. (2016) Prevalence and risk factors related to preterm birth in Brazil. 17;13(Suppl 3):127.
  21. Chiabi A, Mah EM, Mvondo N, Nguefack S, Mbuagbaw L,Kamga KK, et al. (2013). Risk Factors for Premature Births: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Hospital Records in a Cameroonian Health Facility. Afr J Reprod Health.;17(4):77-83.
  22. Sow A, Gueye M, Boiro D. Ndongo AA, Coundoul AM, et al Prematurity: Epidemiology and Etiological Factors in a Maternity Ward in Dakar (Senegal). Clinics Mother Child Health. 2018 Jan 1;15.
  23. Cantarutti A, Franchi M, Monzio Compagnoni M, Merlino L, Corrao G. (2017). Mother’s education and the risk of several neonatal outcomes: an evidence from an Italian populationbased study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 12;17(1):221.
  24. Ruiz M, Goldblatt P, Morrison J, Kukla L, Švancara J, RiittaJärvelin M, et al. (2015) Mother’s education and the risk of preterm and small for gestational age birth: a drivers metaanalysis of 12 European cohorts. J Epidemiol Community Health.;69(9):826–33.
  25. El-Sayed AM, Galea S. (2012). Temporal Changes in Socioeconomic Influences on Health: Maternal Education and Preterm Birth. Am J Public Health.;102(9):1715–21.
  26. Cunningham FG, Kenenth JL, Steven LB, Catherine YS, Jodi SD, Barbara LH et al. (2014). Williams Obstetrics 24th.Ed. New York: McGraw Hill Medical.
  27. Leal MD, Esteves-Pereira AP, Nakamura-Pereira M, Torres JA, Theme-Filha M, Domingues RM, et al. (2016). Prevalence and risk factors related to preterm birth in Brazil. Reprod Health. 17;13(Suppl 3):127.
  28. Pradhan D, Nishizawa Y, Chhetri HP. (2020). Prevalence and Outcome of Preterm Births in the National Referral Hospital in Bhutan: An Observational Study. J Trop Pediatr, 1;66(2):163–70.
  29. Umeigbo BC, Modebe IA, Iloghalu IC, Eleje GU, Okoro CC, Umeononihu OS, et al. (2020). Outcomes of Preterm Labor and Preterm Births: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Analytical Study in a Nigerian Single Center Population. Obstet Gynecol Res, 16;3(1):17–28.
  30. Tietche F, Kago I, Njimoke A, Mbonda E, Koki NP, Tetanye E. (1998) Mortalité hospitalière des nouveau-nés eutrophiques à terme à Yaoundé (Cameroun): Aspects étiologiques. Méd Afr Noire, 45 (3): 193-5.
  31. Muhe LM, McClure EM, Nigussie AK, Mekasha A, Worku B, Worku A, et al. (2019). Major causes of death in preterm infants in selected hospitals in Ethiopia (SIP): a prospective, cross-sectional, observational study. Lancet Glob Health.;7(8):e1130-e1138.
  32. Jain K, Sankar MJ, Nangia S, Ballambattu VB, Sundaram V, Ramji S, et al. (2019). Causes of death in preterm neonates (< 33 weeks) born in tertiary care hospitals in India: analysis of three large prospective multicentric cohorts. J Perinatol. 39(Suppl 1):13-19.
  33. Skogrand A, Harnaes K. (1960). Causes of death in premature infants. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 15;49 (3):321–8.