Variables

Frequency (n)

%

Variables

Frequency (n)

%

Age

 

 

Educational level

 

 

18—30 years

22

9.6

Illiterate

18

7.9

31—43 years

96

42.1

Primary school

21

9.2

44—56 years

75

32.9

Secondary school

42

18.4

>57 years

35

15.4

Higher secondary school

92

40.4

Gender

 

 

University

55

24.1

Male

133

58.3

Monthly income

 

 

Female

95

41.7

Less than 10,000 taka BDT

52

22.8

Religion

 

 

10,000—14,000 taka BDT

131

57.5

Islam

111

48.7

More than 14,000 taka BDT

45

19.7

Hindu

76

33.3

History of previous hospitalization

 

 

Christian

21

9.2

Yes

184

80.7

Buddhist

7

3.1

No

44

19.3

Others

13

5.7

Number of times of hospitalization

 

 

Residency

 

 

1st time hospitalization

74

32.5

Urban

82

36.0

2nd time hospitalization

92

40.4

Rural

146

64.0

3rd time hospitalization

62

27.2

Marital status

 

 

Number of days of hospitalization

 

 

Unmarried

90

39.5

Less than 7 days

88

38.6

Married

138

60.5

7 days to 14 days

94

41.2

Occupational status

 

 

More than 14 days

46

20.2

Service holders

84

36.8

 

 

 

Self-business

108

47.4

 

 

 

Others

36

15.8

 

 

 

Table 3.1: Socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents (n=228)

Serial no

Hospitalization History

Poor
N(%)

Fair
N(%)

Good
N(%)

Very
good,N(%)

M±sd

1.

Attentiveness of the nurses

6(2.6)

76(33.3)

84(36.8)

62(27.2)

2.89±.837

2.

Availability of the nurses

4(1.8)

82(36.0)

78(34.2)

64(28.1)

2.89±.837

3.

Emotional support provided during fear and anxiety

16(7.0)

66(28.9)

104(45.6)

42(18.4)

2.75±.835

4.

Professionalism concerns among the duty nurses

14(6.1)

70(30.7)

82(36.0)

62(27.2)

2.84±.896

5.

Provide about Health condition information

8(3.5)

84(36.8)

76(33.3)

60(26.3)

2.82±.863

6.

Privacy instruction before performing any nursing
procedures

18(7.9)

110(48.2)

58(25.4)

42(18.4)

2.54±.882

7.

Helpful mind of duty nurses towards patients

40(17.5)

44(19.3)

88(38.6)

56(24.6)

2.70±1.028

8.

Discharge health education

40(17.5)

92(40.4)

62(27.2)

34(14.9)

2.39±.944

9.

Family members involvement in nursing care

10(4.4)

82(36.0)

74(32.5)

62(27.2)

2.82±.883

10.

Duty nurses awareness of your needs

44(19.3)

40(17.5)

86(37.7)

58(25.4)

2.69±1.055

Table 3.2: Respondents overall satisfaction regarding nursing care during hospitalization

Level of satisfaction

Frequency

Percentage

Poor satisfied

75

32.9%

Good satisfied

153

67.1%

Table 3.3: shows that it was scored on a scale of 10—40 among them score of 10—25 as poor satisfaction whereas score of 26—40 was taken as good satisfaction. So this table shows that 32.9% respondents had poor satisfaction and 67.1% respondents had good satisfaction

 

Independent variables

Level of Satisfaction

Total

frequency (%)

 

X2, df

 

p-value

Poor
satisfied(%)

Good
satisfied(%)

Gender

 

 

 

 

 

Male

42(31.6)

91(68.4)

133(100)

0.250, 1

0.617

Female

33(34.7)

62(65.3)

95(100)

 

 

Religion

 

 

 

 

 

Islam

38(34.2)

73(65.8)

111(100)

 

 

Hindu

22(28.9)

54(71.1)

76(100)

 

 

Christian

10(47.6)

11(52.4)

21(100)

3.316, 4

0.506

Buddhist

2(28.6)

5(71.4)

7(100)

 

 

Others

3(23.1)

10(76.9)

13(100)

 

 

Residency

 

 

 

 

 

Urban

34(41.5)

48(58.5)

82(100)

4.259, 1

0.039

Rural

41(28.1)

105(71.9)

146(100)

 

 

Marital status

 

 

 

 

 

Unmarried

37(41.1)

53(58.9)

90(100)

4.548, 1

0.033

Married

38(27.5)

100(72.5)

138(100)

 

 

Occupational status

 

 

 

 

 

Service holders

25(29.8)

59(70.2)

84(100)

 

 

Self-business

38(35.2)

70(64.8)

108(100)

0.633, 2

0.729

Others

12(33.3)

24(66.7)

36(100)

 

 

Educational status

 

 

 

 

 

Illiterate

2(11.1)

16(88.9)

18(100)

 

 

Primary school

6(28.6)

15(71.4)

21(100)

 

 

Secondary school

11(26.2)

31(73.8)

42(100)

11.367, 4

0.023

Higher secondary school

41(44.6)

51(55.4)

92(100)

 

 

University

15(27.3)

40(72.7)

55(100)

 

 

History of previous hospitalization

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

67(36.4)

117(63.6)

184(100)

 

 

No

8(18.2)

36(81.8)

44(100)

5.347, 1

0.021

Number of times of hospitalization

 

 

 

 

 

1st time hospitalization

28(37.8)

46(62.2)

74(100)

 

 

2nd time hospitalization

30(32.6)

62(67.4)

92(100)

1.665, 2

0.435

3rd time hospitalization

17(27.4)

45(72.6)

62(100)

 

 

Number of days of hospitalization

 

 

 

 

 

Less than 7 days

38(42.7)

51(57.3)

89(100)

 

 

7 days to 14 days

26(28.0)

67(72.0)

93(100)

6.582,2

0.037

More than 14 days

11(23.9)

35(76.1)

46(100)

 

 

Table 3.4:Relationship between level of patients’ satisfaction on nursing care and their independent variables

In the past few decades there has been a major change occurring in the health care delivery sector tremendously among people in rural as well as urban areas. Awareness on Nursing and health is becoming more clients oriented. People expect the high quality of nursing care along with medical care at the affordable cost. Patients of the health care sector are very awake and aware about their rights and standards of services that he or she is going to pay for. The key success of health care provider mainly depends on patient’s satisfaction. Patient’s satisfaction with nursing services is particularly important since the nursing staff consist the majority of health professional is influenced by various factors mainly divided into two groups; the patients’ factors and service provider factors [1-5]. It is true that patients may have some difficulty in their views for the provided services. Nevertheless, satisfaction is a subjective concept for the patient and on the favor of professionals have to accept its existence and regardless of the validity of the patients’ views [6-7].

The concept of patient satisfaction with care is inseparable from the concept of patient experience with nursing care. Specially, patient’s satisfaction on nursing care is one of the most fundamental factors in monitoring and ensuring the quality of care in health care delivery systems specially hospitals [8-9]. In one of the most and still essential definitions, Risser emphasizes greatly that patients’ satisfactions on nursing is the dimension of convergence between patients’ expectations of ideal care and the perception of care actually received. Berkowitz 2016 reported that the concept of patient’s satisfaction is connected with both direct and indirect experiences with the health care system [10-11].

Nursing services is a vital component of a hospital services because nurses are involved in almost every aspect of patients care in hospitals next to the doctors and consume almost one third of hospital cost [12-13]. In Hospital and other health care systems, nurses are the frontline person for the patients because patients have to meet up with, spend the highest amount of time while hospitalization [4,14-15]. For this reason, satisfaction is a complex concept related to several factors such as patients’ lifestyle, individual and social values, previous experiences and future expectations [16]. The satisfaction of patients with nursing care gained during hospitalization is the most important factor affecting the satisfactions with the entire hospital services [17]. Nursing clinical rounds permit the nurses to closely interact with the patients, respond to their concerns and modify unsatisfying situations due to build up the nurse patient’s interaction via active nursing procedure [18]. A study reported that patient’s satisfaction with nursing care is the most important predictor for the overall satisfaction with hospital care because patients are considered as a best indicator and best source of accurate information on communicativeness, simplicity of explanations and usefulness of information in a hospital setting as well as the only source on whether they were treated in a respectful and dignified manner during hospitalization [19-21].

A study found that good communication between nurse and patients is a vital factor for patients’ satisfaction. This satisfaction depends on overall experiences included attitude of some workers, time consuming and cost of services. Another study indicates other hindrances to quality nursing care were inadequate nursing staff, policy of payment of health services and other ambulatory facilities of patients’ transport [22]. The current study was undertaken with the aim to find out the level of patients’ satisfactions with regard to highlight the clientprofessional interaction that need to be further developed and enhanced among the nurses. This inspiration for nursing staff as well as nursing students helps to improve the unsatisfactory aspects of nursing regarding importance of patients’ satisfaction in nursing profession in Bangladesh.

Study area and period: The study was carried out through the present study in order to explore the patients’ satisfaction with quality of nursing care at a tertiary level hospital named Sylhet MAG Osmani Medical College Hospital (SOMCH), Sylhet from September 2020 to February 2021.

Study design: A descriptive cross sectional survey design was conducted.

Source of population: All patients who were hospitalized in SOMCH.

Study Population: All patients who were available during the data collection and the age group was 18 – 57 years and above. The admitted patients greater than 24 hours who were fully conscious & well oriented to time, place and person and willingly agreed to participate on the day of data collection (inclusion criteria). The study duration was from September 2020 to February 2021.

Sample size determination and sampling technique:A non-convenience sampling technique was used to determine the sample size for the study population. The actual sample size for the study was determined using the formula single Population proportion by assuming 5% degree of freedom and 95% confidence interval at alpha (α = 0.05) and the considering (52.75%) population proportion was taken from a study conducted at SOMCH. So based on the above information the total sample size was calculated by using the following formula. By taking the population proportion p = 52.75%.

Ni= (Zα/2)2 (1-p)/d2, whereas P = Estimate prevalence = 52.75 Ni= (1.96)2 * 0.5275(1-0.5275)/ (0.05)2

On the basis of this model shown 383 participants, But Let n= 275 (Melsew, 2017) [23].

Data collection instrument: The data collection instrument was prepared by researcher himself based on the literature review. A pilot study (pre-test) was done with a sample of 20 patients for its clarity, validity and time required to fill the tools who were not included. Enumerators and supervisors were health professionals and well trained on the tools and at the same time the tools were confirmed for the completeness and consistency of the data and inconsistent questionnaires and interviews were rejected from the data collection at the spot. At last the CVI test score stood on .82. The tools also coded during data collection and before entering to the computer. To ensure consistency and completeness the questionnaire was translated from English to Bangla version. The instruments of data collection consist of two parts:

1. Part-A: Independent variables/ patients demographic data: Socio-demographic characteristics such as age, sex, income, educational status, occupational status, Religion, length of hospital stay, previous experience of admission and etc.

2. Part-B: Dependent variables/ Clinical data: Patients satisfaction level regarding nursing care.

Reliability: The panel of experts noted that the questionnaire was appropriately worded and translated. In addition, a pilot study had also been conducted to determine the reliability of the questionnaire. The reliability test score was ascertained by their opinions at .88.

Scoring system: The interviewing questionnaire were concerned regarding nurses’ activities and scoring ranged from 1 to 4 on a Likert Rating Scale whereas (Very good=4, Good=3, Fair=2 and Poor=1). Thus a total Ten (10) parameters were framed. An overall satisfaction score was calculated by addition of the score of all the ten parameters. The maximum total score was 40 among them score of 10—25 was taken as poor satisfaction whereas 26—40 were as good satisfaction. For significant analysis patients’ response were plotted under the two categories (good satisfied, poor satisfied). Patient’s verbal agreement was taken after that the researchers begun to collect the data. The researcher distributed 275 Bangla questionnaire forms (semi-structured) to all admitted patients and the questionnaire forms were filled by the participants themselves or their representative. At last researcher got 228 questionnaire forms from the participants by the help of nursing staffs. The data collection period was from November to December 2020.

Statistical Analysis: Collected data was manually checked for clarity and correctness immediately and also coded, tabulated and analyzed using descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, frequency) were used to summarize the patients satisfaction and non-parametric test such as chi-square test was used to determine significant difference or association between categorical independent variables (gender, age group, educational status and etc.) and categorical dependent variables(good satisfied, poor satisfied) in patients satisfaction.

Table- 3.1 shows that 228 respondents were participated in this study. Majority respondents (42.1%) were the group of 31—43 years but 44—56 years were only 32.9%. The out of total respondents, 58.3% were male and 48.7% were Muslim. Out of which 64.0% came from rural area while 60.5% were married. Majority respondents’ educational level was higher secondary school (40.4%). Among them, most of the respondents participated from rural area who experienced by the previous admission history (80.7%) and lengthier of hospital stay (41.2%).Table- 3.2 shows that this part consists of 10 items in which Hospitalization History (Patients satisfaction on nursing care) was measured by frequency, percentage, mean and standard deviation. Overall satisfaction regarding nursing care was assessed by 4 point likert scale. Total score of satisfaction was 2.73±.906 (68.25%). Out of 10 items, 1 item on discharge health education had 2.39±.944 but respondents’ statement on Attentiveness of the nurses and Availability of the nurses had 2.89±.837.

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Patients’ satisfaction as the most important predictor of the overall satisfaction in the hospital setting is the key indicator. The measurement of patients’ satisfaction with nursing care is particularly important during hospital stay since satisfaction can provide some idea of how they would have to modify their provision of services in order to make their patients more satisfied. Thus this study aimed to assess the level of patients’ satisfaction towards nursing care provided at Sylhet MAG Osmani Medical College Hospital, Bangladesh. This study reported a favorable satisfaction regarding nursing care where the good satisfaction was 67.1% and which is similar to the study Edmealem, 2019; Nyongesa, 2014; Ahmad, 2010; Negash, 2014; Rajbanshi, 2014 [24-28]. The literature indicates the wide range of findings on the importance of patients’ demographic characteristics and social factors in determining patients’ satisfactions. The findings of this study showed that there was a statistically significant result between patients’ satisfaction and their age, residency, marital status, educational level, history of previous hospitalization and number of days of hospitalization at p< 0.05. In this study showed that generally older patients were more satisfied with nursing care due to their greater familiarity and different attitude on continuity of care and found out a statistically significant relation between age and their satisfaction of Liu,2007; Milutinovic,2012 [29-30]. But the percentage of age group of 18—30 years had higher expectations due to their greater emphasis on the expense and aggressive nature of hospital care. Our findings reveal that sex did not influence the satisfaction on nursing care which is similar to Kailash, 2015; Jaipaul, 2003 [1,31]. But Khamseh and Hala et al., reported the little difference in patients’ satisfaction between male and female. This study showed that 64.0% of the patients from rural areas were more satisfied compared to urban area (36.0%) which is contrary to Kailash, 2015 [1,32-33]. Now a day, Bangladeshi rural patients get easily more health information from the community level hospital and clinic of how they would have to reduce the logistic problems. These factors ultimately account for the greater satisfaction for the rural patients. Concerning marital status, this study reported that 60.5% married patients were satisfied than 39.5% of unmarried patients and also conducted the similar result of Edmealem, 2019; Ozlu, 2015 [24,34]. Because of marriage, the social supports and cares that married patients receive from their family might decrease their expectation levels similar to Edmealem, 2019 [24].

The satisfaction levels also vary in different education level. This study showed that 40.4% of the higher secondary educated patients were more satisfied than lower educated patients (18.4%) and also reported the similar result to Kailash, 2015; Melsew, 2017 [1,23]. Generally, the higher educated patients are more informative and rationalized of how they would probably be able to comprehend the situation of nursing care in hospital setting but contrary to Khamseh, 2006; Edwards, 1998 [33,35]. Moreover, satisfaction is a very abstract concept having so much of subjectivity that previous admission history is the great concern in assessing the patients’ satisfaction level and statistically significant to Melsew, 2017 [23]. The present study revealed the fact that the patients who stayed in hospital more than 7 to 14 days had a higher a good score of satisfaction than admission days increased similar to Ahmed, 2014 [36]. Patients satisfaction with selected dimensions of nursing care showed that patients were more satisfied with availability of the nurses (62.3%), attentiveness of the nurses (64.0%), discharge instruction by nurse (42.1%) and privacy instruction given by nurses (43.8%). The results of this study are comparatively favorable on level of satisfaction towards certain dimensions of nursing care. In the present study on the basis of tool score of patients’ satisfaction with nursing care was found the overall satisfaction (68.25%) and reported the consistent result at Mohanan et al., 2010 [37]. The study supports the findings of interpersonal communication, accessibility and convenience of hospitalization history and recommends for the modification and improvement of nursing care facilities in determining the patients’ satisfaction. In this study the researcher believe that patients’ satisfaction not merely depends on a state of receiving the treatment but they ensure the fulfillment of quality nursing care. However, additional organizational or extra organizational issues that play a vital role in attitude changes of patients and optimally nursing practices be addressed to improve the nursing care in hospital setting.

In the world of competition, patients’ views have become an important indicator in the assessment of nursing care in the hospital setting. The patients’ satisfaction with nursing care is greatly influenced by the demographic, environmental and cultural factors. The nurses need to know the patients age, sex, inhabitant, occupation, educational level and others factors what are effective in changing the patients’ satisfaction. Though in this finding respondents gender, religion and occupation find out a non-significant relation, their comments suggest some improvements need especially in nursing activities such as discharge health education, communication and number of concerns may be a low cost strategy to improve the nursing care in hospital for patients’ satisfaction.

Based on findings of this study following recommendation can be suggested for future study:

1. Further study can be done to find out the strengths and weaknesses of nursing care services and others factor behind poor satisfaction of the patients.

2. Further study can be done on patients’ satisfaction on outpatients.

3. Health related institutions and colleges can be taken the needful steps on nursing profession to enhance the quality of nursing care to ensure the maximum patients satisfaction.

Limitations of the study: There are several limitations to the design: 1. since the study was cross-sectional; it shows only the temporal relationship between variables. 2. Sample size was small 3. Time and fund was not enough but the confidentiality rights were maintained.

The researchers would like to express heartfelt thanks to the patients who participated willingly to share their experiences in this study and gratefully acknowledge to all co-authors for their support and cooperative service provision. All authors contributed to the drafting, review, and approval of this manuscript. Finally, researchers’ gratitude goes to Department of Public Health, Leading University and SOMCH, Sylhet, Bangladesh.

Before data collection period, required permission was obtained from Department of Public Health, Leading University, Sylhet and IRB memo no: LUS/PH/106/1202/25864/151.While the main aim of this study was explained to the patients, then the participants took part in the data collection voluntarily. Researchers determined to ensure the confidentiality rights of their personal data.

The authors declared have no potential conflicts of interest associated with this paper.


  1. Kailash C, Ajay KJ (2015) Evaluation of Patient satisfaction in Relation to Patient factors in Surgical centre- A study from central India; 14: 104-9.
  2. Quintana JM, Gonzalenz N, Bilbao A, et al. (2006) Predictors of patient satisfaction whit hospital health care. BMC Health Serv Res 6: 102.
  3. Horak BJ (1997) Strategic planning in healthcare: building a quality-based plan step by step. 1st ed. New York: Quality Resources 17-37.
  4. Yellen E, Davis GC, Ricard R (2002) The measurement of patient satisfaction. Journal Nursing Care Quality 16: 23-9.
  5. Merkouris A, Papath nassoglou ED, Lemonidou C (2004). Evaluation of patient satisfaction with nursing care: quantitative or qualitative approach? Int J Nurs Stud 41: 355-67.
  6. Linder-Pelz SU (1982) Toward a theory of patient satisfaction. SocSci Med 16: 57782.
  7. Bond S, Thomas LH (1992) Measuring patients’ satisfaction with nursing care. J AdvNurs.17: 52-63.
  8. Creanga AA, Gullo S, Kuhlmann AKS, Msiska TW, Galavotti C (2017) Is quality of care a key predictor of perinatal health care utilization and patient satisfaction in Malawi? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 17.
  9. Maconko M, Kopański Z, Strychar J, Małek Ł (2016) Patient satisfaction and the methods of its assessment. J Clin Healthcare 3: 14-9.
  10. Risser N (1975) Development of an instrument to measure patient satisfaction with nurses and nursing care in primary care settings. Nurs Res 24: 45-52.
  11. Berkowitz B (2016) “The Patient Experience and Patient Satisfaction: Measurement of a Complex Dynamic” OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing 21: 1.
  12. Sara thapa, Alisha Joshi (2019) Patients satisfaction with Quality Nursing Care at Teaching Hospital, Chitwan. IOSR Journal of Nursing and Health Science 8: 71-5.
  13. Khan M, Hassan R, Anwar S, Babar T (2007) Khalid Shakeel Babar. Patient Satisfaction with Nursing Care. Rawal Med Journal 32: 27-9.
  14. Laschinger HS, Hall LM, Pedersen C, Almos J (2005) A psychometric analysis of the patient satisfaction with nursing care quality questionnaire an actionable approach to measuring patient satisfaction. Journal of Nursing Care Quality 20: 220-30.
  15. Wagner D, Bear M (2009) Patient satisfaction with nursing care: A concept analysis within a nursing framework. Journal of Advanced Nursing 65: 692-701.
  16. Acaroğlu, R., Şendir, M., Kaya, H., & Sosyal, E. (2007). The influence of individualized nursing care to the quality of living related to patient satisfaction and health. İstanbul University Florence Nightingale School of Nursing Journal 15: 61-7.
  17. Yılmaz M (2001) The criteria of healthcare quality: Patient satisfaction. Cumhuriyet University Journal of the School of Nursing 5: 69-74.
  18. Meade, Bursell&Ketelsen (2006) Effects of nursing rounds: on patients call light use satisfaction and safety American Journal of Nursing; 106: 58-70.
  19. Riyadh A, Abed Al- Hussen (2015) Assessment of Patients satisfaction Regarding Nursing Care Provided at General Hospitals in Al-Najaf City. kufa Journal for Nursing sciences 161-8.
  20. Cleary PD (2003) A hospitalization from hell: a patient’s perspective on quality.Ann Intern Med 138: 33-9.
  21. Leino-Kilpi H, Vuorenheimo J (1992) Patient satisfaction as an indicator of the quality of nursing care. Vard Nord Utveckl Forsk 12: 22-8.
  22. Rasheed N, Arya S, Acharya A, khandekar J (2012) Client Satisfaction And Perceptions About Quality Of Health Care At A Primary Health Centre Of Delhi, India. Indian J Community Health 24: 237-42.
  23. Melsew GT (2017) In-patients satisfaction level towards nursing care services and associated factors at public hospitals of Addis Ababa, Ethiopa. Journal of Health, Medicine and Nursing 1: 1-17.
  24. Edmealem A, Asfaw Y, Ademe S, Tegegne B (2019) Patient’s satisfaction and associated factors towards nursing care in Dessie Referral Hospital, Northeast Ethiopia. Clin J Nurs Care Pract 3: 053-8.
  25. Nyongesa MW, Onyango R, Kakai R. (2014). Determinants of clients’ satisfaction with healthcare services at Pumwani Maternity hospital in Nairobi-Kenya. Int J Soc Behav Sci.; 2: 11- 17.
  26. Ahmad MM, Alasad JA, Nawafl eh H. (2010). Nursing care and quality of life among Jordanian patients with cancer. Leadership in Health Services. 23: 233-243.
  27. Negash AK, Negussie D, Demissie AF (2014) Patients’ satisfaction and associated factors with nursing care services in selected hospitals, Northwest Ethiopia. Am J Nurs Sci 3: 34-42.
  28. Rajbanshi L, Dungana G, Gurung Y, Koirala D (2014) Satisfaction with health care services of out patient department at Chitwan Medical College Teaching Hospital, Nepal Journal of Chitwan Medical College 4: 11-8.
  29. Liu YL, Wang GL (2007) Inpatient satisfaction with nursing care and factors influencing satisfaction in a teaching hospital in China. Journal Nursing Care Quality 22: 266-71.
  30. Milutinovic D, Simin D, Brkic N, Brkic S (2012) The patient satisfaction with nursing care quality: The psychometric study of the Serbian version of PSNCQ questionnaire. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences; 26: 598-606.
  31. Jaipaul C, Rosenthal G (2003) Are older patients more satisfied with hospital care than younger patients. J Gen Intern Med 18: 23-30.
  32. Hala YS, Hoda AM, Esraa EM (2013) Patients' Perceptions As Indicators of Quality of Nursing Service Provided At Al Noor Specialist Hospital at Makkah Al Moukarramah, KSA. Journal of American Science 9: 71-8.
  33. Khamse M, Aqili R, Moghadam, Arabi A (2006) Patients' satisfaction with outpatient services at Firoozgar Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics, Payesh J 1: 71-4.
  34. Özlü ZK, Uzun Ö (2015) Evaluation of satisfaction with nursing care of patient’s hospitalized in surgical clinics of different hospitals. Int J Caring Sci 8: 19-24.
  35. Edwards SC (1998) An anthropological interpretation of nurses' and patients' perceptions of the use of space and touch. J Adv Nurs 28: 809-17.
  36. Ahmed TA, et al (2014) Levels of Adult Patients’ Satisfaction with Nursing Care in Selected Public Hospitals in Ethiopia. International Journal of Health Sciences, Qassim University 8: 4.
  37. Mohanan K, Kaur S, Das K, Bhalla A (2010) Patient satisfaction regarding nursing care at Emergency Outpatient Department in a Tertiary care Hospital. JMHHB 15: 54-8.